Randomised trials comparing different healthcare settings: an exploratory review of the impact of pre-trial preferences on participation, and discussion of other methodological challenges
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Aug 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Natalie Taylor|
|16 Aug 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Mark Corbett|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Aug 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Sep 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Mark Corbett|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Sep 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Oct 2016||Editorially accepted|
|19 Oct 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12913-016-1823-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.