You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Public accountability needs to be enforced –a case study of the governance arrangements and accountability practices in a rural health district in Ghana

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Dec 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Seye Abimbola
28 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adalsteinn Brown
12 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Irene Agyepong
20 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - Sara Van Belle
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adalsteinn Brown
13 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Irene Agyepong
17 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Seye Abimbola
3 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Sara Van Belle
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Sara Van Belle
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
8 Oct 2016 Editorially accepted
12 Oct 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12913-016-1836-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement