You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 5 Factors affecting Annual HbA1c test in a year, 2013

From: Case management of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional survey in Chongqing, China

Variables Type Non-annual HbA1c test N(%) Annual HbA1c test N(%) Unadjusted OR/95%CI P Adjusted OR/95%CIe P
Type of residence Urban 268 (89.63) 31 (10.37) 1.00
Rural 188 (95.43) 9 (4.57) 2.42 (1.12 ~ 5.19) 0.02 NA NA
Education a Middle school or higher 154 (87.01) 23 (12.99) 1.00
Primary school 175 (95.11) 9 (4.89) 2.90 (1.30 ~ 6.47) 0.01 NA NA
Illiterate 122 (93.85) 8 (6.15) 2.28 (0.98 ~ 5.27) >0.05 NA NA
Income category b High 140 (85.89) 23 (14.11) 1.00
Middle 171 (95.53) 8 (4.47) 3.51 (1.52 ~ 8.09) <0.01 NA NA
Low 140 (94.59) 8 (5.41) 2.88 (1.24 ~ 6.65) 0.01 NA NA
Type of health insurance c UEBMI 103 (81.10) 24 (18.90) 1.00
URRBMI 352 (95.65) 16 (4.35) 5.13 (2.62 ~ 10.01) <0.01 5.40 (2.73 ~ 10.69) <0.01
Involved in the targeted disease reimbursement program d Yes 135 (88.24) 18 (11.76) 1.00
No 318 (93.53) 22 (6.47) 1.93 (1.00 ~ 3.71) <0.05 NA NA
  1. a Data was missing for five patients
  2. b Data was missing for six patients
  3. c Data was missing for one patients
  4. d Data was missing for three patients
  5. e Adjusted for study sites, age, sex, education, type of residence, level of income, type of health insurance, status of enrollment in the targeted disease reimbursement program and years of living with Type 2 DM. Data without statistically significant were not shown