You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Money’s (not) on my mind: a qualitative study of how staff and managers understand health care’s triple Aim

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Apr 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dane Pflueger
26 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robbert Huijsman
27 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Naomi Fearns
7 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - Marie Höjriis Storkholm
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Naomi Fearns
21 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dane Pflueger
7 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Marie Höjriis Storkholm
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marie Höjriis Storkholm
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
24 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
31 Jan 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12913-017-2052-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement