You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Validation of an instrument for measuring satisfaction of patients undergoing hemodialysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Feb 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jenny Flythe
26 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Creina Twomey
31 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Rafael Mauricio Sanabria Arenas
Resubmission - Version 2
31 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jenny Flythe
19 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - Rafael Mauricio Sanabria Arenas
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Rafael Mauricio Sanabria Arenas
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Rafael Mauricio Sanabria Arenas
Resubmission - Version 5
7 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
6 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Rafael Mauricio Sanabria Arenas
Resubmission - Version 6
6 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
11 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Rafael Mauricio Sanabria Arenas
Resubmission - Version 7
11 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
19 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
3 May 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12913-017-2251-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement