You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Development and validation of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) induced angioedema investigator rating scale and proposed discharge criteria

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Sep 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anthony Brown
7 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Wilkerson
8 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Bonner
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anthony Brown
22 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Wilkerson
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Bonner
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Bonner
Resubmission - Version 5
6 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Nicola Bonner
Resubmission - Version 6
25 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
27 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
22 May 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12913-017-2274-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement