‘Waiting for’ and ‘waiting in’ public and private hospitals: a qualitative study of patient trust in South Australia
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emily Arnold|
|23 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sandra Braaf|
|6 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Ward|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sandra Braaf|
|27 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emily Arnold|
|27 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Paul Ward|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Apr 2017||Editorially accepted|
|5 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2281-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.