Healthcare Quality Improvement and ‘work engagement’; concluding results from a national, longitudinal, cross-sectional study of the ‘Productive Ward-Releasing Time to Care’ Programme
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Griffiths|
|8 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - G. Ross Baker|
|16 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Mark White|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Griffiths|
|9 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Mark White|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Griffiths|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|1 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2446-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.