You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Healthcare Quality Improvement and ‘work engagement’; concluding results from a national, longitudinal, cross-sectional study of the ‘Productive Ward-Releasing Time to Care’ Programme

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Griffiths
8 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - G. Ross Baker
16 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mark White
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Griffiths
9 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mark White
Resubmission - Version 3
9 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Griffiths
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
12 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
1 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12913-017-2446-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement