You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evaluating a Dutch cardiology primary care plus intervention on the Triple Aim outcomes: study design of a practice-based quantitative and qualitative research

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Feb 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Tessa Quanjel
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Tessa Quanjel
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christi Deaton
19 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hanneke Drewes
18 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tessa Quanjel
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christi Deaton
25 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tessa Quanjel
Resubmission - Version 5
25 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
28 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tessa Quanjel
Resubmission - Version 6
28 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
29 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12913-017-2580-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement