A review of Grey and academic literature of evaluation guidance relevant to public health interventions
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Remare Ettarh|
|18 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emily Stockings|
|17 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Denford|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Denford|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|12 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2588-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.