You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: The five-year costs and benefits of extended psychological and psychiatric assessment versus standard intake interview for women with comorbid substance use disorders treated in compulsory care in Sweden

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
7 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Shearer
5 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brady Horn
17 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tina Olsson
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brady Horn
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
30 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-2854-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.