Implementation of surgical debriefing programs in large health systems: an exploratory qualitative analysis
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|19 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ian Donald Shepherd Civil|
|11 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jane L Holl|
|28 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Mary Brindle|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ian Donald Shepherd Civil|
|1 Mar 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Mary Brindle|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Mar 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Mar 2018||Editorially accepted|
|27 Mar 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-3003-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.