Responsibilities with conflicting priorities: a qualitative study of ACT providers’ experiences with community treatment orders
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Samuel Law|
|15 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carol Harvey|
|28 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Hanne Stuen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Samuel Law|
|17 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carol Harvey|
|9 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Hanne Stuen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Mar 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Samuel Law|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|5 Apr 2018||Editorially accepted|
|18 Apr 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-3097-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.