You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Responsibilities with conflicting priorities: a qualitative study of ACT providers’ experiences with community treatment orders

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samuel Law
15 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carol Harvey
28 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hanne Stuen
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samuel Law
17 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carol Harvey
9 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hanne Stuen
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samuel Law
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Apr 2018 Editorially accepted
18 Apr 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-3097-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement