The struggle against perceived negligence. A qualitative study of patients’ experiences of adverse events in Norwegian hospitals
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|6 May 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Pinto|
|9 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alissa L. Russ|
|18 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah Tregunno|
|14 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Gunn Hågensen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Pinto|
|16 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Gunn Hågensen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Mar 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Pinto|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Apr 2018||Editorially accepted|
|25 Apr 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-3101-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.