You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The struggle against perceived negligence. A qualitative study of patients’ experiences of adverse events in Norwegian hospitals

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anna Pinto
9 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alissa L. Russ
18 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Tregunno
14 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gunn Hågensen
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anna Pinto
16 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Gunn Hågensen
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anna Pinto
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
8 Apr 2018 Editorially accepted
25 Apr 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-3101-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement