You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparing the application of two theoretical frameworks to describe determinants of adverse medical device event reporting: secondary analysis of qualitative interview data

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Drozda
15 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa Baysari
18 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Laura Desveaux
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Laura Desveaux
Resubmission - Version 3
28 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
29 May 2018 Editorially accepted
4 Jun 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-3251-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement