Comparing the application of two theoretical frameworks to describe determinants of adverse medical device event reporting: secondary analysis of qualitative interview data
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Aug 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joseph Drozda|
|15 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melissa Baysari|
|18 Apr 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Laura Desveaux|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Apr 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 May 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Laura Desveaux|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 May 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 May 2018||Editorially accepted|
|4 Jun 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-3251-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.