Barriers and facilitators to using a web-based tool for diagnosis and monitoring of patients with depression: a qualitative study among Danish general practitioners
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Jan 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ama Fenny|
|8 Mar 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Yellowlees|
|2 May 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Mette Krog|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 May 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Jun 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Mette Krog|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Jun 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Jun 2018||Editorially accepted|
|27 Jun 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12913-018-3309-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.