You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A prospective cohort study measuring cost-benefit analysis of the Otago Exercise Programme in community dwelling adults with rheumatoid arthritis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Liubove Murauskiene
19 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sandipan Bhattacharjee
20 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Siyar Adulrazaq
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Liubove Murauskiene
26 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mohammad Rifat Haider
19 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Siyar Adulrazaq
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mohammad Rifat Haider
6 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Siyar Adulrazaq
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Siyar Adulrazaq
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
11 Jul 2018 Editorially accepted
20 Jul 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-3383-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement