You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Value co-creation in healthcare: evidence from innovative therapeutic alternatives for hereditary angioedema

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dominik Mahr
25 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martina G. Gallarza
10 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Talias
31 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Rosanna Spanò
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Talias
9 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Rosanna Spanò
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Talias
26 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Rosanna Spanò
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Rosanna Spanò
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
13 Jul 2018 Editorially accepted
20 Jul 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-3389-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement