You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Harvesting the wisdom of the crowd: using online ratings to explore care experiences in regions

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Apr 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
18 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Chaplin
18 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Adelhardt
18 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Roy Hendrikx
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Chaplin
12 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Adelhardt
7 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Roy Hendrikx
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Roy Hendrikx
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
25 Sep 2018 Editorially accepted
20 Oct 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12913-018-3566-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement