You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 RBF4MNH impact on crude and effective obstetric care coverage (adjusted analysisa)

From: Impact of results-based financing on effective obstetric care coverage: evidence from a quasi-experimental study in Malawi

Outcome Estimate Effect size (%-points) 95%-confidence interval p-value
Crude coverage β3 (baseline vs. midterm) −4.3 −11.2—3.4 0.28
β5 (baseline vs. endline) 1.2 −10.0—11.8 0.83
Effective coverage (no cut-off) β3 (baseline vs. midterm) 4.7 −1.4—10.8 0.13
β5 (baseline vs. endline) 7.1 −0.1—15.0 0.07
Effective coverage (50% cut-off) β3 (baseline vs. midterm) 1.7 −22.2—25.7 0.89
β5 (baseline vs. endline) −1.9 −28.6—24.8 0.89
Effective coverage (60% cut-off) β3 (baseline vs. midterm) 21.1 −8.1—50.3 0.16
β5 (baseline vs. endline) 31.0 5.9—56.2 0.02
Effective coverage (70% cut-off) β3 (baseline vs. midterm) 25.8 1.3—50.4 0.04
β5 (baseline vs. endline) 16.4 −7.9—40.8 0.19
Effective coverage (80% cut-off) β3 (baseline vs. midterm) 13.1 −8.7—43.9 0.24
β5 (baseline vs. endline) 10.5 −10.8—31.8 0.33
  1. EmOC = emergency obstetric care, β3 = coefficient for effect estimate at midterm, β5 = coefficient for effect estimate at endline
  2. a Crude coverage estimates adjusted for district, distance to nearest EmOC, socioeconomic status; effective coverage estimates in addition also adjusted for facility type and ownership