- Open Access
Driving brand equity in health services organizations: the need for an expanded view of branding
© The Author(s). 2018
- Published: 14 December 2018
Branding—the assignment of names, logos, slogans, and related elements of identity to institutions and their product offerings for the purpose of conveying desired images to target audiences—is of paramount importance in the health services industry. Associated initiatives traditionally have centered on developing verbal and visual brand expressions, but opportunities abound to drive brand equity by supplementing traditional pursuits with new, different, and unexpected expressions that afford highly memorable experiences.
Willis-Knighton Health System has possessed an expanded view of branding for decades. While the system has directed thorough attention toward traditional brand expressions, additional identity opportunities outside the bounds of traditional branding thought have been pursued vigorously. There perhaps is no better illustration of Willis-Knighton Health System’s expanded approach to branding than that of Willis the Bear, the institution’s iconic teddy bear mascot developed to promote labor and delivery services. This article presents the origins and development of this brand expression, particularly emphasizing the need to address nontraditional elements of identity for purposes of driving brand equity.
Given the importance of brand management and extraction of associated value, health services organizations must diligently direct attention toward branding initiatives. Traditional approaches, when executed well, deliver excellent results, but enhanced value can be derived by addressing nontraditional brand elements which afford unique opportunities to differentiate given establishments from their competitors, facilitating institutional viability and vitality.
- Brand equity
- Identity management
Healthcare providers face an unending barrage of activities and obligations required for the successful delivery of medical services [1, 2]. Many of these pursuits pertain to marketing [3–6] and, of these, one of paramount importance is that of branding, the assignment of names, logos, slogans, and related elements of identity to institutions and their product offerings for the purpose of conveying desired images to target audiences [7, 8]. Aside from presenting imagery designed to resonate with customers, thus enticing them to forward their patronage, branding also permits audiences to distinguish institutions and their products from competitive offerings, making the practice essential for facilitating product differentiation [7, 9–12]. Symbols representing given healthcare establishments, color schemes on associated logos, jingles featured in television commercials, and so on all emerge through branding initiatives. Since branding efforts indeed assign identity to institutions and their product offerings, branding sometimes is referred to as identity management [13–15].
Branding constitutes the very beginning of the marketing communications process [8, 15]. Before advertisements and other forms of promotion are prepared, the imagery associated with the institution and its products must, of course, be developed. As such, great care must be taken to ensure that branding is addressed accurately and comprehensively before advancing communications initiatives [15, 16]. Since branding efforts represent the cornerstone of all marketing communications, neglectful formulation will negatively impact forthcoming advertisements and other forms of promotion, making proper assembly of brands an absolute necessity [7–10]. Once thoughtfully prepared, however, branding efforts do not cease. Instead, they continue indefinitely as a means of ensuring that formulated identities remain meaningful and relevant, something essential due to the ever-changing nature of the environment and its associated circumstances and challenges [15–18]. Brands indeed must evolve as environments evolve. A brand expression relevant today can become irrelevant with the passage of time as tastes, preferences, policies, and other variables change, necessitating vigilance in monitoring brand performance and a willingness to introduce updates and enhancements as needed to ensure excellence.
Branding activities traditionally have centered on preparing verbal (e.g., names, slogans) and visual (e.g., logos, illustrations) brand expressions [7, 16, 19], but today, increasing attention is being directed toward developing branding imprints across the full array of senses—sight (e.g., logos, illustrations, unique color schemes), sound (e.g., signature audio tones before commercials, branded music-on-hold services), taste (e.g., logo-bearing cookies, premium meals for patients), touch (e.g., logo-embossed business cards, signature linens, branded stuffed animals), and smell (e.g., aromatherapy in patient rooms, signature scents within institutions)—as occasions permit [7, 19–22]. Such an expanded view of branding offers opportunities to connect with patients in ways never before imagined. Supplementing traditional brand expressions with new, different, and unexpected expressions affords highly memorable experiences which drive brand equity (i.e., the value of the brand) [8, 15, 20].
In the mid-1990s, after many years of concerted effort, Shreveport, Louisiana-based Willis-Knighton Health System assumed market leadership in the Ark-La-Tex, the region of America where the states of Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas converge. With construction of its newest hospital, WK Pierremont Health Center, beginning soon, the stage was set for the institution to serve an even greater number of patients, further advancing Willis-Knighton Health System’s market position. Maternity services, in particular, witnessed dramatic growth during this era, with an increasing number of women turning to Willis-Knighton Health System for their labor and delivery needs. This uptrend had begun years earlier, courtesy of a series of strategic investments, including the employment of highly-skilled caregivers, provision of the region’s most advanced medical technologies, delivery of care in attractive and inviting medical servicescapes featuring appealing labor, delivery, and recovery (LDR) rooms, and initiation of unique target marketing strategies. Associated services, carrying Willis-Knighton Health System’s carefully crafted brand identity, were marketed effectively via advertisements and other forms of promotion, attracting mothers-to-be in high numbers, with each being drawn to the institution’s well-rounded service experience designed exclusively for expectant moms.
With traditional branding initiatives addressed comprehensively, Willis-Knighton Health System investigated possible opportunities to expand branding efforts to bolster identity and add a degree of uniqueness to the labor and delivery experience. During this particular era, new mothers remained hospitalized for several days following childbirth, leading executives to consider offering something special for the new parents while they awaited returning home. Ultimately, a steak dinner, served either in the hospital’s private dining room or bedside, was chosen, providing a premium meal for the parents to enjoy in celebration of the birth of their baby. This novel brand expression delivered extensive value for many years, but in the late 1990s, health insurance reimbursement changes were introduced, ushering in revised protocols which necessitated that new mothers be discharged shortly after delivering their babies. Quite obviously, this alteration demanded modification of many service delivery elements, including the steak dinner brand expression. With discharge occurring so quickly after delivery, the dinner, by necessity, had to be boxed up and sent home with the new parents, relegating the formerly meaningful experience to nothing more than a carry-out meal offering little brand value. With the steak dinner brand expression diminished, a worthy successor was sought.
Over the Christmas 1999 holiday season, a fitting replacement emerged, courtesy of an idea elicited by a store display at a local shopping mall. A particular retailer happened to be offering a custom teddy bear, prompting the notion that a Willis-Knighton Health System-branded teddy bear might serve as a suitable brand expression for the institution’s labor and delivery services. A teddy bear was purchased and the concept was vetted comprehensively, drawing on perspectives from within and outside of the organization, in an effort to ascertain branding potential and value. Ultimately, the idea was deemed to be meritorious, with the branded teddy bear being viewed as unique (i.e., not offered by any healthcare provider in the market), memorable (i.e., expected to leave a lasting impression), appropriate (i.e., viewed as a perfect gift to celebrate a child’s birth), enduring (i.e., expected to be kept and appreciated), and marketable (i.e., viewed to possess significant promotions potential). Such qualities, well known to be attributes of excellent brands [25, 26], gave Willis-Knighton Health System confidence in the viability of the concept.
Since its introduction, over 64,000 Willis the Bear stuffed animals have been distributed, one for every baby born at Willis-Knighton Health System, commemorating the precious event of childbirth. To ensure that the expression retains its exclusivity, the bears are made available only to those who deliver their babies at a Willis-Knighton Health System hospital. They are not offered in gift shops or available via any other route. This particular approach to distribution has hastened Willis the Bear’s almost legendary status. In fact, staff members charged with distributing them routinely are bombarded with inquiries from fellow employees, patients for services other than labor and delivery, and even members of the general public, inquiring as to how they can receive one of the stuffed animals. The bears initially were stored in a locked supply room and distributed as needed to each of Willis-Knighton Health System’s hospitals, cross-checking births against bears delivered to maintain inventory control, but later, the decision was made to place the bears in the institution’s Pyxis systems (i.e., automated medication dispensing units) for distribution convenience and security. To this day, expectant mothers regularly ask staff members if they will receive a bear, indicating how well Willis the Bear works as a brand expression.
Willis-Knighton Health System’s Willis the Bear mascot illustrates the power and utility of supplementing traditional branding pursuits with nontraditional, expanded perspectives. A simple little stuffed animal has been shown to deliver robust value, enhancing identity management efforts system wide, ultimately fostering brand equity. From a Willis-Knighton Health System logo being stitched into his paw (which ensures that brand identity remains in place) to presentation of the character in the form of a stuffed animal (which supports its open and ongoing display in homes) to restrictive distribution (which ensures exclusivity), Willis the Bear was carefully devised to derive maximum benefits from the associated brand expression. While such expanded branding manifestations do not replace traditional verbal and visual brand expressions, if well crafted, they create marketing communications synergies which magnify the totality of identity management efforts.
Arriving at brand expressions falling outside of traditional parameters requires creativity and a willingness to explore and experiment with unique possibilities, coupled, of course, with an intimate understanding of patients and their associated wants and needs. While intensive efforts are required to identify worthy nontraditional brand expressions, on discovery and realization, true brand assets emerge, fortifying the brand portfolios of given healthcare establishments. As with all branding initiatives, vigilance is required, as environmental changes can erode the value of given expressions, just as Willis-Knighton Health System experienced when reimbursement changes diminished the impact of its steak dinner brand expression. By directing ongoing attention toward branding initiatives in the context of the larger environment, however, any required alterations or replacements can be addressed in a timely fashion to ensure continued branding prowess, leading in some situations, as in the case of Willis the Bear, to even greater brand value. Given that institutional viability and vitality hinge, at least in part, on branding successes, associated identity management activities should not be taken lightly by healthcare establishments. An expanded approach to branding which taps nontraditional elements serves as the perfect complement to traditional pursuits, magnifying the potential of health and medical institutions to successfully attract and engage their patient populations.
A special note of appreciation is extended to Margaret Elrod, Senior Vice President, who discovered the concept which led to Willis-Knighton Health System’s branded teddy bear. Appreciation also is extended to Rhonda MacIsaac, Director of Community Relations, who assisted Margaret Elrod in bringing Willis the Bear to life. They, along with Marilyn Joiner, Darrell Rebouche, and Gaye Dean, provided helpful and highly-valued assistance leading to the development and publication of this article.
Article processing charges were funded by Willis-Knighton Health System.
Availability of data and materials
About this supplement
This article has been published as part of BMC Health Services Research Volume 18 Supplement 3, 2018: Engaging patients, enhancing patient experiences: insights, innovations, and applications. The full contents of the supplement are available online at https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-18-supplement-3.
The authors jointly developed the submitted manuscript, with each performing critical roles from early conceptualization through to the production of the full manuscript. The manuscript resulted from a collaborative effort. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
JKE is President and Chief Executive Officer of Shreveport, Louisiana-based Willis-Knighton Health System, the region’s largest provider of healthcare services. With over 53 years of service at the helm of the institution, JKE is America’s longest-tenured hospital administrator. A fellow in the American College of Healthcare Executives and honoree as a Louisiana Legend by Friends of Louisiana Public Broadcasting, he holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Baylor University, a master’s degree in hospital administration from Washington University School of Medicine, and an honorary doctorate of science and humane letters from Northwestern State University of Louisiana. He is the author of Breadcrumbs to Cheesecake, a book which chronicles the history of Willis-Knighton Health System.
JLF Jr. is Chair of the James K. Elrod Department of Health Administration, James K. Elrod Professor of Health Administration, and Professor of Marketing in the School of Business at LSU Shreveport where he teaches a variety of courses in both health administration and marketing. He holds a BBA in marketing from the University of Mississippi; an MBA from Mississippi College; a PhD in public administration and public policy, with concentrations in health administration, human resource management, and organization theory, from Auburn University; and a PhD in business administration, with a major in marketing, from the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. He is the author of six books, including Health Care Marketing: Tools and Techniques, 3rd Edition, published by Jones and Bartlett Learning. JLF Jr. also serves as Vice President of Marketing Strategy and Planning at Willis-Knighton Health System.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
JKE and JLF Jr. are both employed with Willis-Knighton Health System.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Shi L, Singh DA. Essentials of the US health care system. 4th ed. Burlington: Jones and Bartlett; 2017.Google Scholar
- Ginter PM, Duncan WJ, Swayne LE. Strategic management of health care organizations. 7th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2013.Google Scholar
- Berkowitz E. Essentials of health care marketing. 4th ed. Burlington: Jones and Bartlett; 2017.Google Scholar
- Hillestad S, Berkowitz E. Health care market strategy: from planning to action. 4th ed. Burlington: Jones and Bartlett; 2013.Google Scholar
- Thomas RK. Marketing health services. 3rd ed. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 2014.Google Scholar
- Elrod JK, Fortenberry JL Jr. Billboard advertising: an avenue for communicating healthcare information and opportunities to disadvantaged populations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(Suppl 4):787.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fortenberry JL Jr. Health care marketing: tools and techniques. 3rd ed. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett; 2010.Google Scholar
- Fortenberry JL Jr. Cases in health care marketing. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett; 2011.Google Scholar
- Wheeler A. Designing brand identity: an essential guide for the whole branding team. 5th ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2018.Google Scholar
- Tybout AM, Calkins T, editors. Kellogg on branding. Hoboken: Wiley; 2005.Google Scholar
- Kemp E, Jillapalli R, Becerra E. Healthcare branding: developing emotionally based consumer brand relationships. J Serv Market. 2014;28(2):126–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Vries K, McKeever J. Constructing a better brand. Mark Health Serv. 2008;28(4):15–9.Google Scholar
- Melewar TC, Karaosmanoglu E, editors. Contemporary thoughts on corporate branding and corporate identity management. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.Google Scholar
- Schmitt B, Simonson A. Marketing aesthetics: the strategic management of brands, identity, and image. New York: The Free Press; 1997.Google Scholar
- Fortenberry JL Jr. Nonprofit marketing. Burlington: Jones and Bartlett; 2013.Google Scholar
- Calder BJ, Reagan SJ. Brand design. In: Iacobucci D, editor. Kellogg on marketing. New York: Wiley; 2001.Google Scholar
- Keller K. The brand report card. Harv Bus Rev. 2000;78(1):147–57.Google Scholar
- Berthon P, Hulbert J, Pitt L. Brand management prognostications. Sloan Manag Rev. 1999;40(2):53–65.Google Scholar
- Lindstrom M. Broad sensory branding. J Prod Brand Manage. 2005;14(2):84–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lindstrom M. Brand sense: build powerful brands through touch, taste, smell, sight, and sound. New York: The Free Press; 2005.Google Scholar
- Hultén B. Branding by the five senses: a sensory branding framework. J Brand Strategy. 2017;6(3):281–92.Google Scholar
- Agarwal S. Customer sense: how the 5 senses influence buying behaviour. J Consum Mark. 2015;32(4):307–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Elrod JK, Fortenberry JL Jr. Peering beyond the walls of healthcare institutions: a catalyst for innovation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(Suppl 1):402.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Elrod JK. Breadcrumbs to cheesecake. Shreveport: R&R Publishers; 2013.Google Scholar
- Keller KL. Strategic brand management: building, measuring, and managing brand equity. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2013.Google Scholar
- Johansson JK, Carlson KA. Contemporary brand management. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2015.Google Scholar