“Struggling with practices” – a qualitative study of factors influencing the implementation of clinical quality registries for cardiac rehabilitation in England and Denmark
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|1 May 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Harsh Golwala|
|8 Aug 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eugene Nelson|
|24 Jan 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Cecilie Lindström Egholm|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Jan 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Jan 2019||Editorially accepted|
|6 Feb 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12913-019-3940-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.