You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: “Struggling with practices” – a qualitative study of factors influencing the implementation of clinical quality registries for cardiac rehabilitation in England and Denmark

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 May 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Harsh Golwala
8 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eugene Nelson
24 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Cecilie Lindström Egholm
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
30 Jan 2019 Editorially accepted
6 Feb 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12913-019-3940-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement