You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 8 By site - Cost-effectiveness of SHHC. ICERs (vs Status Quo) from the societal perspective

From: Cost-effectiveness of a community-based cardiovascular disease prevention intervention in medically underserved rural areas

Site ID Weight loss BMI reduction CRP reduction Simple 7 increase ASCVD QALY saved
3 683 1823 *224,455 8392 414,770
5 408 1028 1153 1762 1,290,021
6 *1692 *5099 983 2732 184,905
8 681 1892 1827 1827 430,353
11 436 1729 945 5012 63,429
12 2291 5547 1214 1068 1,264,574
14 719 1854 1055 983 56,118
16 790 2022 1560 2342 *3,674,482
  1. The “*” implies that the effect is in the unexpected direction. For example, an ICER for weight loss with “*” implies that on average participants gained instead of lost body weight after the SHHC