You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Facilitators, best practices and barriers to integrating family planning data in Uganda’s health management information system

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Aug 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Halamka
6 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian E. Dixon
9 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marie-Claude Trudel
26 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Stephen Ojiambo Wandera
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian E. Dixon
22 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marie-Claude Trudel
18 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Stephen Ojiambo Wandera
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian E. Dixon
10 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marie-Claude Trudel
25 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Stephen Ojiambo Wandera
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
8 May 2019 Editorially accepted
22 May 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12913-019-4151-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement