You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Taking note: A qualitative study of implementing a scribing practice in team-based primary care clinics

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Mar 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amy Cunningham
19 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christopher Miller
3 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mar Pastor
5 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dale Strasser
6 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Norbert Karl Semmer
7 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ladislav Duban
8 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elisabeth Wilson-Evered
3 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Van Tiem
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christopher Miller
13 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mar Pastor
24 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amy Cunningham
25 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dale Strasser
30 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Norbert Karl Semmer
1 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elisabeth Wilson-Evered
11 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Van Tiem
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Van Tiem
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
17 Jul 2019 Editorially accepted
14 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12913-019-4355-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement