You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Differences in the quality of oral anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists in German GP practices – results of the cluster-randomized PICANT trial (Primary Care Management for Optimized Antithrombotic Treatment)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Jan 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adam Rose
19 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annett Salzwedel
2 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Cornelia Mertens
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adam Rose
5 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annett Salzwedel
2 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Cornelia Mertens
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Cornelia Mertens
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
25 Jul 2019 Editorially accepted
1 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12913-019-4372-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement