You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Fig. 1 | BMC Health Services Research

Fig. 1

From: An instrument for quality assurance in work capacity evaluation: development, evaluation, and inter-rater reliability

Fig. 1

Percentage distribution of the superordinate criterion per peer. Figure shows peers judgements based on 20 medical reports reviewed by all peers for the superordinate criterion per peer. The calculation of percentage agreement demonstrate the individual usage of different deficiency categories when reviewing identical reports on a three-point rating scale; green colour: percentage of reports judged with no argument interruptions; yellow colour: percentage of reports judged with argument interruptions that can be bridged by the physician; red colour: percentage of reports judged with argument interruptions that cannot be bridged by the physician; n = 325 reviews; n = 18 peers

Back to article page