You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Descriptive results for the formal review of the manual (n = 11; missing = 1)

From: An instrument for quality assurance in work capacity evaluation: development, evaluation, and inter-rater reliability

Criterion M Range M M M
How do you judge … IM/GP O/S N/P
… the structure of the manual 1.8 1–3 1.8 2.3 1.3
… the extent of the manual 2.6 1–5 1.8 3.8 2.3
… the layout of the manual 2.3 1–4 1.8 2.3 3.0
… the clarity of the quality domains and their test items 2.1 1–3 1.8 2.3 2.3
… the understandability of the manuals‘introduction 2.1 1–4 1.8 2.5 3.0
… the understandability of the test items 3.2 2–5 2.5 4.0 2.3
… the manual in total 2.4 1–3 2.3 2.5 2.4
  1. six-point rating scale (1 = very good; 6 = insufficient). M Mean, IM/GP Internal medicine/general practitioner, O/S Orthopaedic/surgery, N/P Neurology/psychiatry