You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Improving outpatient satisfaction by extending expected waiting time

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Nov 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - weimin Ma
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Payal Mehra
5 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aisha Jalil
9 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - weimin Ma
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aisha Jalil
29 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Payal Mehra
9 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - weimin Ma
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
24 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aisha Jalil
2 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Payal Mehra
28 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - weimin Ma
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - weimin Ma
Resubmission - Version 6
2 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
6 Aug 2019 Editorially accepted
13 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12913-019-4408-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement